Comments on: Fancy ListViews, Part Two

By: James

James — Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:30:00 +0000

please provide code

By: Anon

Anon — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:15:00 +0000

utterly useless articles, I'm sure the info is hidden in their somewhere but since its unreadable on chrome and windows explorer.... I give up.

By: Jorsher

Jorsher — Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:33:25 +0000

Very informative articles, but as others have said over and over, it's a pain to for my brain to parse. I think it's ironic how the non-code text is in a "code box," and the actual code isn't.

By: jaymz

jaymz — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:28:05 +0000

These are great posts in terms of info but as others have said they're almost impossible to actually read with whatever code formatting is going on, its completely useless.

By: Richard Smith

Richard Smith — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:54 +0000

Extremely hard to read these useful posts w/o proper editing...

By: Bob

Bob — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:19:02 +0000

for God sake! please fix the source code on these ListViews posts!

By: mario

mario — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:52:42 +0000

Mark, you mentioned about recycling existing rows are tricky and indeed it is tricky... especially when the layout in rows are different.. can you provide some sample on how to handle this? im having a hard time figuring it out. I have some part of my list that needs only one textview and the remaining have 2 textview. What i did is I set that textview to invisible or gone. Others row were rendered correctly but when i scrolled down and reached a row with only one textview, some rows that is supposed to have 2 textview became 1.

Can you help?? thanks..