<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobilizy Proposes Open AR Markup Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.androidguys.com/2009/09/23/mobilizy-proposes-open-ar-markup-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/09/23/mobilizy-proposes-open-ar-markup-language/</link>
	<description>The trusted source for Android news and opinion &#124; Est. 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JoaJP</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/09/23/mobilizy-proposes-open-ar-markup-language/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>JoaJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=7498#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>Using KML to represent places and paths: I have to agree with the concept - the AugmentThis! app does just that. 
It is never too early to think about extending KML, but at this point, all features that I have seen in AR apps can be covered using straight KML, no? Time will tell if KML is too restrictive, but at this point, I do not see a need to go through the exercise of trying to establish a new standard. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using KML to represent places and paths: I have to agree with the concept - the AugmentThis! app does just that.<br />
It is never too early to think about extending KML, but at this point, all features that I have seen in AR apps can be covered using straight KML, no? Time will tell if KML is too restrictive, but at this point, I do not see a need to go through the exercise of trying to establish a new standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

