<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Round of ADC 2 Draws to a Close Ahead of Expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/</link>
	<description>The trusted source for Android news and opinion &#124; Est. 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-7283</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-7283</guid>
		<description>My top 3 
 
I loved too Head to Head Racer game and Eclosion for the demonstration of how is excellent. 
 
My favorite is the online multiplayer android and browser based bomberman like game World of Bombs (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeugame.com/wob2).&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.zeugame.com/wob2).&lt;/a&gt; Even if there was few people connected during ADC2 round 1, and some app crashes, even if it is not present for round 2, I think it has the potential after some bug fixes and improvements to become a must to have  on android platform. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My top 3 </p>
<p>I loved too Head to Head Racer game and Eclosion for the demonstration of how is excellent. </p>
<p>My favorite is the online multiplayer android and browser based bomberman like game World of Bombs (<a href="http://www.zeugame.com/wob2)." target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.zeugame.com/wob2" rel="nofollow">http://www.zeugame.com/wob2</a>). Even if there was few people connected during ADC2 round 1, and some app crashes, even if it is not present for round 2, I think it has the potential after some bug fixes and improvements to become a must to have  on android platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-7167</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-7167</guid>
		<description>Here is my app: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://picasaweb.google.com/106852852157864246571/CanyonChallenge#5390475197810392194&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://picasaweb.google.com/106852852157864246571...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my app:<br />
<a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/106852852157864246571/CanyonChallenge#5390475197810392194" target="_blank">http://picasaweb.google.com/106852852157864246571...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-7090</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-7090</guid>
		<description>No there was no fee to enter into the contest. My app is there in the contest and I did not pay a buck. But you need to pay $25 if you are want a developer account to post on to the market. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No there was no fee to enter into the contest. My app is there in the contest and I did not pay a buck. But you need to pay $25 if you are want a developer account to post on to the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-7000</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-7000</guid>
		<description>My app broke as a result of an Android API throwing a proactive IllegalStateException in 1.6. While I wont argue against this being a good heads-up for those porting to 1.6, it renders the core of my 1.5 app a paperweight. Furthermore, because my app can run for extended periods of heavy use (this is well tested for 1.5, and not the junk that was the bulk of the competitors) without running into problems that 1.6 is trying to guard against, the midstream switch to 1.6 completely squashes my shot at ADC2, and more importantly tosses aside 2+ months of my free time.  
 
From the stats my app collects, I am able to see that ~30% of the contest graders were running 1.6 over the period of the contest.... So I can probably assume that 30% of my end grade was lost :( 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My app broke as a result of an Android API throwing a proactive IllegalStateException in 1.6. While I wont argue against this being a good heads-up for those porting to 1.6, it renders the core of my 1.5 app a paperweight. Furthermore, because my app can run for extended periods of heavy use (this is well tested for 1.5, and not the junk that was the bulk of the competitors) without running into problems that 1.6 is trying to guard against, the midstream switch to 1.6 completely squashes my shot at ADC2, and more importantly tosses aside 2+ months of my free time.  </p>
<p>From the stats my app collects, I am able to see that ~30% of the contest graders were running 1.6 over the period of the contest.... So I can probably assume that 30% of my end grade was lost <img src='http://www.androidguys.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yul</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-7528</link>
		<dc:creator>Yul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-7528</guid>
		<description>Yes, not most of apps were broken but only few. I can state that because I&#039;ve rated about 100 apps twice - once on 1.5 then on 1.6 (probably judjing app bug) (few apps even 3 times!!!). 
 
roy - google asked for 25$ not 5$ - you have to have a dev account to post to market. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, not most of apps were broken but only few. I can state that because I&#039;ve rated about 100 apps twice - once on 1.5 then on 1.6 (probably judjing app bug) (few apps even 3 times!!!). </p>
<p>roy - google asked for 25$ not 5$ - you have to have a dev account to post to market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbq</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-6988</link>
		<dc:creator>bbq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-6988</guid>
		<description>@BKdroid - 1.6 didn&#039;t break the majority of apps.  The only issue I heard of was a fix for an issue in 1.5 where you could instantiate abstract classes.  If you were instantiating abstract classes then your app would break in 1.6.  However, if you are dumb enough to try instantiating an abstract class you deserve to fail in the ADC. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BKdroid - 1.6 didn&#039;t break the majority of apps.  The only issue I heard of was a fix for an issue in 1.5 where you could instantiate abstract classes.  If you were instantiating abstract classes then your app would break in 1.6.  However, if you are dumb enough to try instantiating an abstract class you deserve to fail in the ADC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-6927</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-6927</guid>
		<description>@BKdroid 
Word! 
 
I feel kind of used though. I mean, if Google would have asked 5 bucks for every person entering the contest I would have had to sift through tons of sudoku games and other crap... Second round should be better! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BKdroid<br />
Word! </p>
<p>I feel kind of used though. I mean, if Google would have asked 5 bucks for every person entering the contest I would have had to sift through tons of sudoku games and other crap... Second round should be better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKdroid</title>
		<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2009/10/06/first-round-of-adc-2-draws-to-a-close-ahead-of-expectations/comment-page-1/#comment-6925</link>
		<dc:creator>BKdroid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.androidguys.com/?p=8661#comment-6925</guid>
		<description>could also have something to do with 1.6 breaking a majority of the apps..... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could also have something to do with 1.6 breaking a majority of the apps.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

