Meizu MX 4-core is now available globally

Meizu MX 4-core is now available globally

The original (dual-core) Meizu MX is one of the most popular smartphones in China. Shortly after the launch there, it was quietly made available around the world from various retailers. Later, after the huge success of the MX, Meizu announced a quad-core version, the MX 4-core. For a time, the MX 4-core was only available in China, much like its predecessor.

Well, the MX 4-Core is now available for purchase globally. Unfortunately for some, it’s only available in 32GB and 64GB model, with hefty price tags of $650 and $750, respectively. Granted, the device is running a quad-core Cortex A9 processor, with ICS and a nice 8MP camera. Do those specs make the device worth $650-$750? We’ll leave such judgments up to you. If you do feel like shelling out the cash for a Meizu MX 4-core, you can find one on Amazon.

In the meantime, do you think the price is too steep? Would you buy this phone? Drop a comment below!

Source GSMArena

About author

AndroidGuys
AndroidGuys 4639 posts

Founded on November 5, 2007, we've enjoyed bringing you the latest in Android news and rumors. Updated daily, we strive to deliver reviews, opinions, and updates on all things related to Android.

You might also like

News and Rumors

Samsung Epic 4G Rooted!

Those Android devs never stop, do they? Hot off the heels of last week, when the Backflip and Droid 2 were both rooted, the Samsung Epic 4G, Sprint’s version of

News and Rumors

Sprint intros Framily plans for January 10

New option promises group savings with separate bills Sprint on Tuesday introduced its latest weapon in the battle against other wireless providers. Called “Framily” plans (no joke), they allow groups

News and Rumors

T-Mobile Roadmap Shows Moto ‘Morrisson’ Not Same As ‘Bigfoot’

Recently a handset code-named ‘Bigfoot’ found its way online via a few sneaky folks who got their hands on T-Mobile’s Android roadmap.  Initially, we believed that T-Mobile was going to

2 Comments

Leave a Reply