Is Google worried about Samsung?

google_worried_samsung_720bThere’s an interesting piece in the Wall Street Journal today which suggests that Google’s Andy Rubin may be troubled by the growing momentum in Samsung. The post Samsung Sparks Anxiety at Google tells of a Google which has become worried that Samsung will soon try to throw its weight around.


You know the whole Google and Motorola acquisition? Reportedly, that was not only about securing patents but also a hedged bet against Samsung. The chatter about an X-Phone to combat the iPhone and Samsung seems to carry more weight. Initially, I couldn’t understand why Google would want to compete against Samsung but now I do.

More advertising revenue

Samsung is reported to earn roughly 10% in online-advertising revenue that Google generates from its search engine. But, with growing market share and no foreseeable threats, Samsung may ask for a bigger piece of the pie. In fact, Samsung is already said to have indicated that they do want more.

More Android leverage

In addition to a larger advertising revenue split, Samsung could also ask for earlier access to Android. This, as I see it, would likely compound the “threat” of Samsung. Google giving a head start to Samsung would only add to the appeal of a Galaxy product.

Consider that it’s also not only about what Samsung asks Google to provide but what Samsung could get from others. Imagine a scenario where Samsung begins to build in Microsoft Bing as the search engine and cuts Google out of ads. Samsung already works with Microsoft for mobile devices running Windows Phone. Samsung is also developing an OS with Intel, Tizen, which could help to fracture relationships.

Really, who could blame Samsung for such a move? Two years ago, the Droid brand was synonymous with Android as a platform. Today, people ask, “Is that your Galaxy?” as if it’s either iPhone or Galaxy. Android has grown leaps and bounds in the last few years, largely on the backs of Samsung.

Samsung has worked hard to offer branded experiences and services (Media Hub, Samsung Apps, etc). Are they not allowed to take on Google, Amazon, and Apple? Amazon uses Android for its Kindle Fire series and also provides an app ecosystem. Can they not also do the same for its handsets and tablets? I’m not saying I like the idea; however, I cannot fault them for having lofty aspirations.

Too soon to worry?

Of course, much is being made about something before it has actually happened. Samsung is not threatening to drop Android and Google is not giving a head start to other handset makers. At least, this is what we see publicly. Google has said on a number of time that it does not care what happens with Android and that it’s free to use in any manner. Then again, for Google not to worry at all would be be folly.

There are countless other handset makers using Android and the platform is rising as a whole. Unfortunately (or not), there does not appear to be anyone making the level of noise that Samsung is. Sure, names like Huawei and ZTE are growing their base and steadily rising around the world. Still, at 40.2% of the market, Samsung is far ahead of second place Huawei and its 6.6% share.

HTC, LG, Sony, and Motorola are the names we are most familiar with in the United States however we should also not discount Pantech, ZTE, and Huawei. As a whole, these guys are moving the needle forward; some, are doing better than others. The HTC One looks to be an excellent flagship experience for 2013 and the Xperia Z is one of the best devices we’ve seen yet. Looking forward, LG will continue building steam and the Optimus G series could become a much-anticipated line.

The Motorola X-Phone could be Google’s way of combining in-house expertise on hardware and software, much in the manner of Apple’s iPhone. Google has repeatedly denied any special favor or advantage for its mobile arm but that does not mean they would not consider such a thing. The biggest problem, here, is not that it could strain a relationship with Samsung, but that it could do the same for all other Android phone manufacturers.  It’s a fine line to be sure.

Backup plans

The name of the game right now is contingency plans. We can see that with handset makers employing Windows Phone, buying up WebOS, or developing new platforms. Toss in Mozilla’s Firefox OS and things get even muddier. A web-based platform such as Chrome works exceedingly well for netbooks; 4G LTE could give way to a similar experience for mobile devices.

Remember that Android is only a few years old and that things change quickly in the mobile space. Ask RIM or Nokia and they’ll tell you how fast things can move.

What’s next?

I suspect that much of what happens in the next year is already being mapped out and that we’re waiting for things to unfold in the public eye. I get the sense that Google and everyone involved is staring at each other with their hands on their hips, ready to draw.

We’ll likely see hints of  Google’s ambitions with the unveiling of the X-Phone where we will see how the device is positioned. How will it be offered? Will it be advertised any differently than Nexus products? Will consumers buy into the idea?

What’s your take?

What do you think of all of this? Should Google be concerned about Samsung and the momentum of the Galaxy brand? Would they be justified in giving the X-Phone special favor? How would you treat the relationships with other handset makers? I’d love to hear your thoughts and opinions in the comments below!


  • Pingback: Is Google worried about Samsung? | MY ANDROIDZ()

  • Rick

    I think the Nexus 4 is a bigger issue. I ordered one, waited 4 weeks and then gave up and cancelled. Bought a Lumia instead.

    The Nexus should have been a game changer. It should have changed the way people buy mobile phones. Google could have pulled the rug from under the big manufacturers like Amazon are with the Fire. By undercutting the competition, getting people to buy hardware off contract and using Google’s vanilla Android and content it would have redefined the sales model. What stopped this happening was that Google did not have control production and supply. This is where they could succeed with the xphone.

  • Great article really explained alot. I just agree with everything mentioned.

  • almahix

    My present phone is a Galaxy Nexus. My next phone will be a Nexus. I want to see Verizon use their influence with Google and the next Nexus manufacturer, be it Samsung, Moto, Sony, or whoever, to assure their network is included. That omission from the Nexus 4 is unforgivable. (I am not crazy for Verizon, but I have a grandfathered plan at a discount that won’t be found elsewhere, and theirs is the best service where I am and where I go.)

    • phoenix

      There was a reason that they did not create a CDMA phone. That was because the carriers wanted to much control of the phone since the CDMA network is locked down unlike GSM networks. One thing that google did not like was the fact that the carriers were dragging their feet when it came time to update the nexus devices. I believe that this was the main reason google did not create the phone it was not that the network didn’t want them it seems as if the networks were not willing to bend for what google wanted for the nexus user experience You can find an article about this maybe about 6 months back, I believe they did an interview with Andy on this subject. You have to read between the lines but it basically says what I just said.

    • spectremANDROID

      Verizon’s attitude toward the phones that it offers is completely opposed to the very best points of Nexus devices and the perks of Nexus device ownership. I thinks as Nexus devices and Verizon subscribership goes, it’s really going to be one or the other.

  • Don

    You’re forgetting one important fact. Samsung wouldn’t have gotten to where it is now without Google. Google has no reason to worry. They’ve got the upper hand. If Sammie wants more, they’re just being greedy. Google can take away the magic carpet under their feet anytime.

  • Pingback: Is Google worried about Samsung? - 3G eStick()

  • Take whatever WSJ and NYT publish with a lot of salt.. Remember it also said Apple is prepping an iWatch with flexible display. It was debunked saying that it was an intentional leak by Apple to arrest the stock price slide. Now we know that the rumour was just a pathetic attempt to increase the stock price and make as if Apple is innovating… This is also a pathetic attempt to drive a wedge between Google and Samsung or make it look like all is not well with Android. This will also fail just like all the others – Like Oracle’s java case being the doomsday scenario for android etc.,

  • Pingback: Google: Investing In Its Long-Term Mobile Strategy | AndroTabAndroTab()

  • The other disadvantage is you only use this IP to your browsing activity.

    In this constantly shifting globe of technology,
    the smartphone commerce is flourishing and scattering its paths increasingly more with each fresh
    establishment in it. Most those who own i – Phone’s are notable for having
    a unique style, and also a type which is sleek and clever.