Android an Also-Ran to the iPhone Already?

As part of our daily habits and rituals for working on AndroidGuys, we have RSS feeds, alerts, and bookmarks that we hit up for Android news. Whether it’s a blog posting or tech site writing up something on the OS, we’re pretty much on top of things around here. One of the articles we came across today is called “Six Reasons iPhone Delivers Where Android Won’t” and it’s found over at WebMonkey.

I’m not going to go through a straight up 6-point comparison and rebuttal, but I will offer some insight from the other side of the fence. While Scott Loganbill makes some valid points in his piece, I think it might be premature to do the whole apples to oranges thing. Here’s a couple of takeaways I’d like to have his readers come away with if given the chance.

Regarding contracts: “In America, they’re two-year slammers which cost about $175 to break out of, courtesy of AT&T. Who’s left wanting a phone in the mobile marketplace? At best, Google will be competing for the slackers who don’t really care much about mobile phone technology and those who will end their existing contracts in the next couple years — depending on when the luster wears off on the iPhone.”

Android will probably appeal to the techies first and foremost. They’re currently the only ones really in “the know” right now. It will take actual devices in stores before the general public becomes aware of Android. The “slackers” will make up a decent chunk of customer base if only because Android is a free, open platform for companies to use. With less expense to pass along to the consumers, we could see it on lower-end handsets rather quickly. Oh, by the way, there were roughly 440 million Nokia handsets sold last year alone. That’s an awful lot of people left wanting phones. How many do you think HTC, Motorola, Samsung, and LG sold combined? They’re all founding members of the Open Handset Alliance and each will be supporting Android.

Regarding distribution: “Software developers can make money easily on the iPhone. Draw up a gadget nobody’s thought of, get it through Apple’s strict reviewing process, get featured on the App Store front page and you might earn $50,000 in your first month on the store. Write up an application for Android and you’ll be lucky to get any exposure at all, let alone figure out how to get paid for it.

Have you heard about Android Market? Same deal. How about what T-Mobile is doing by allowing developers to write for their entire product line? Yep. There will be plenty of legitimate places to sell your apps. On the Apple side of things, if Apple doesn’t let you in their App Store, then you simply won’t be able to distribute it legally. They are the gatekeepers, be that a thing good or bad.

Regarding handsets: “We now know the HTC Dream will work with Android, but we’re also promised Android can be ported to any smartphone device.

That’s never been promised by anyone. Wishful thinking at best. Would I like to see Android on a T-Mobile Dash, BlackBerry Curve? You betcha. Not gonna happen though. Now, HTC might make the same phone available in a Windows Mobile and Android iteration, but that is probably as close as it will get. What is true is that Android is free and available to any company or OEM who wants to use it. Also true is that Android will be available on trackball devices, touchscreens, flip phones, and more. Even devices without a screen. I’ve been saying since November ’07 that we will get Android on set-top boxes.

Regarding developers:Apple has a SDK, developer support and profitable App store, all of which have enabled it to attract a gaggle of developers.

Nearly 1,800 applicants entered into the first Android Developers Challenge. That was using this “out of date SDK and its skimpy documentation” – as Loganbill puts it. Imagine what will be done for the second challenge. Don’t forget all of the companies and giant software entities that did not enter into the challenge. There will be no shortage of Android developers, ever.

I don’t want to get into a true point/counterpoint, but I think you guys get the picture. I have to give credit to Scott for trying to stay balanced as his previous article “Five Reasons Android Might Deliver Where iPhone Won’t” is worth a read. Perhaps a better title for the current piece should be “Six Reasons iPhone Delivers Where Android Won’t… As of Today“.

I recommend you guys also check out Michael Martin’s response over at the Google And Blog. He echos some of what I said here, but also brings his own thoughts to the table.

Note: Select outbound links may include affiliate tracking codes. Revenue generated from any potential purchases is used to fund AndroidGuys. Read our policy.



  1. When I read that piece of garbled facts (and non-facts), I left impressed by the short and subjective view of the writer. I believe that with the first article he was paving the way to blow Android up in favor of Apple’s product.

    Also, I was really disappointed that such an inaccurate text could be published at a useful and respectable web site, such as WebMonkey.

    Really disappointed.

  2. @Tony S.:

    I’m suffering from pronoun interpretation trouble — you use “he” in a context of three male authors, and so it is difficult to tell who “he” is in any given spot.

    My responses weren’t “to” Michael Martin. If anything, they were “to” Mr. Longbill, the author of the WebMonkey piece that Mr. Martin was responding to. Mr. Martin asked me to comment, and so I did. Mr. Martin and I may disagree a bit on specific details (e.g., I don’t think Google’s brand will be used as strongly as I think he does), but I think we’re in agreement that few, if any, of the points in the WebMonkey article truly indicate that Android is as far behind iPhone as Mr. Longbill made it appear.

    I hold little ill will against iPhone, and frankly I get tired of the Android-vs.-iPhone portrayal. I tend to take the long view, and the iPhone has helped and hurt Android’s chances in roughly equal measure.

  3. Sorry Mark,
    I was refering to Scott Loganbill all the time, the author of the article at Webmonkey.
    It seems that I crossed the names..

  4. create quality content easily. guest blogging is…

    wonderful way to get thousands of visitors instantly. now the question is how can you get maximum benefit by your guest post? the only constraint is to get your guest post approved by top blogs. they have strict criteria to accept…

Comments are closed.