After the Galaxy Note7 fiasco, Samsung embarked on a quest to recapture consumer trust. But the Korean tech giant isn’t concerned only about its image, it also cares about the environment. So this week, Samsung announced it’s in the process of reviewing options in order to limit the negative environmental impact brought about by the death of the Galaxy Note7.

The truth is, Samsung was coerced into taking this step by a Greenpeace statement issued a week earlier asking the smartphone maker to find ways to re-use certain rare materials like cobalt, gold, palladium and tungsten which are to be found in the faulty Galaxy Note7 model, Samsung is asking customers to return.


According to a report coming Reuters, Samsung said:

We recognize the concerns around the discontinuation of the Galaxy Note 7 and are currently reviewing possible options that can minimize the environmental impact of the recall in full compliance with relevant local environmental regulations.”

Samsung is doing itself a favor by issuing this statement. After all a lot of customers might be put off by a careless approach regarding the matter.

5 alternatives to consider instead of the Samsung Galaxy Note7

According to an article dating back to October from Motherboard, a Samsung spokesperson said that the company has a process in place in order to safely dispose of the phones. But how does one go about destroying around 2 million Galaxy Note7 smartphones without leaving an environmental footprint?


It’s a question that Samsung will eventually have to give an answer to. For the most part it is expected the phones won’t be recycled, although given the large phone quantities to be disposed of recycling seems like the smart thing to do.

It turns out that we’re really bad at recycling smartphones with most of the precious elements in phones like Galaxy Note7 ending up lost. And it’s these rare elements that are the most environmentally destructive and labor-intensive to mine. Hence Greenpeace’s concerns.

The Galaxy Note7 debacle is estimated to have cost the Korean tech giant a whopping $19 billion. Samsung is just starting to get back on its feet and a bunch of environmental accusations wouldn’t help its recovery.

Note: Select outbound links may include affiliate tracking codes and AndroidGuys may receive compensation for purchases. Read our policy. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.


  1. How about waiting until they know whats wrong with them, then fixing them and reselling them. OR…identify the defective units by lot numbers, send the list of unaffected IMEI’s to the carriers and get them recertified as OK for sale. Yes it would be expensive but compared to what – losing the entire wholesale cost of the phone – then the cost of handling and disposal. Even if Samsung ended up retailing the repaired units direct at wholesale it’s still better than getting nothing for them. What really bothers me the most about this is the thought of a Note 7 that’s working perfectly and is easily the best phone I’ve ever owned getting ‘disposed of’…whatever that means.

    • No matter how great the phone is (was), public perception and acceptance won’t change no matter what Samsung says now. The airlines, cruise lines, etc., won’t allow them. For those of us who travel and use this as our primary work phone, no degree of “assurances” from Samsung will make it acceptable. And, this is coming from someone bought the first and replacement Note 7’s. There is not another phone on the market today that comes close to what it offered. But, …

Comments are closed.